Faculty Steven Wachs
Statistician Specializing in Product Reliability and Quality
Dexter, Michigan, United States
Steven Wachs has 25 years of wide-ranging industry experience in both technical and management positions. Steve has worked as a statistician at Ford Motor Company where he has extensive experience in the development of statistical models, reliability analysis, designed experimentation, and statistical process control.
Steve is currently a Principal Statistician at Integral Concepts, Inc. where he assists manufacturers in the application of statistical methods to reduce variation and improve quality and productivity. He also possesses expertise in the application of reliability methods to achieve robust and reliable products as well as to estimate and reduce warranty. In addition to providing consulting services, Steve regularly conducts workshops in industrial statistical methods for companies worldwide.
RAPS - This course has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 1.15 credits towards a participant's RAC recertification upon full completion.
Overview
Experimentation is frequently performed using trial and error approaches which are extremely inefficient and rarely lead to optimal solutions. Furthermore, when it’s desired to understand the effect of multiple variables on an outcome (response), “one-factor-at-a-time” trials are often performed. Not only is this approach inefficient, it inhibits the ability to understand and model how multiple variables interact to jointly affect a response. Statistically based Design of Experiments provides a methodology for optimally developing process understanding via experimentation.
Design of Experiments has numerous applications, including:
- Fast and Efficient Problem Solving (root cause determination)
- Shortening R&D Efforts
- Optimizing Product Designs
- Optimizing Manufacturing Processes
- Developing Product or Process Specifications
- Improving Quality and/or Reliability
This webinar will review the key concepts behind Design of Experiments. A strategy for utilizing sequential experiments to most efficiently understand and model a process is presented. Many common types of experiments and their applications are presented. These include experiments appropriate for screening, optimization, mixtures/formulations, etc. Several important techniques in experimental design (such as replication, blocking, and randomization) are introduced. A Case Study involving optimizing a manufacturing process with multiple responses is presented.
Why Should You Attend
- Learn a methodology to perform experiments in an optimal fashion
- Review the common types of experimental designs and important techniques
- Develop predictive models to describe the effects that variables have on one or more responses
- Utilize predictive models to develop optimal solutions
Webinar Takeaway
- Motivation for Structured Experimentation (DOE)
- DOE Approach / Methodology
- Types of Experimental Designs and their Applications
- DOE Techniques
- Developing Predictive Models
- Using Models to Develop Optimal Solutions
- Case Study
Learning Objective
- Understand where and how DOE should be used
- Be able to make immediate improvements in using experimentation for problem solving, product development, process improvement, etc.
Who will Benefit
- Operations / Production Managers
- Quality Assurance Managers
- Process or Manufacturing Engineers or Managers
- Product Design Personnel
- Scientists
- Research & Development personnel
1.15 RAC CREDITS
RAPS - This course has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 1.15 credits towards a participant's RAC recertification upon full completion.
World Compliance Seminars (WCS) is a Regulatory Affairs Professional Society (RAPS) RA Professional Development Portal provider. World Compliance Seminars is committed to enhancing the ongoing professional development of regulatory affairs professionals and other stakeholders through appropriate regulatory affairs learning activities and programs. World Compliance Seminars has agreed to follow RAPS-established operational and educational criteria